 As the debate continues over the omission of Dwayne Bravo and Kieron  Pollard from the West Indies World Cup squad in Australia and New  Zealand, the Express today publishes a letter to the Editor which makes a  case for on cricketing grounds, the two players should have been  included in the squad.
As the debate continues over the omission of Dwayne Bravo and Kieron  Pollard from the West Indies World Cup squad in Australia and New  Zealand, the Express today publishes a letter to the Editor which makes a  case for on cricketing grounds, the two players should have been  included in the squad.
Dear Editor,
Please allow me to comment on the omission of Dwayne Bravo and  Kieron Pollard from the West Indies squad for the World Cup beginning in  Australia and New Zealand later this month. Chief selector Clive Lloyd  should be ashamed of himself to claim that he has the best interests of  the region at heart and pick a side to represent us in this showpiece  event that excludes both Bravo and Pollard. The quality of both these  players in this format is beyond dispute and I contend that Bravo has  claims to being considered the most complete allrounder in West Indies  cricket since Gary Sobers and Bernard Julien. So where is the fairness  in WI cricket?
Much has been made recently on social and in conventional media of  Pollard’s and Bravo’s last 15 or 16 innings.  That commentary, in my  view, is quite misleading and I feel compelled to respond with some  statistics that paint a more accurate picture of the reality.
Those who seek to justify the omission of the pair have generally  omitted, conveniently or perhaps intentionally, both their bowling  averages and the fact that both are undoubtedly among the better  fieldsmen in world cricket today. But current figures show that Pollard  is the only West Indian batsman who has scored three centuries in the  One-Day game batting at number six.  He is also a destructive match  winner who has scored over 2000 runs and a highly proficient medium pace  bowler with 44 wickets to his name. Incidentally, as a far as I am  aware, he is the only player who has made four centuries in the regional  four-day game but has never been called up for Test duty.
And there are players called up to play in Tests for the West  Indies without ever having  made a century in the four-day regional  tournament.
Bravo has played 164 matches, capturing 199 wickets at an average  of 29.51.  Among present-day players, he is the leading wicket-taker for  the WI in ODIs and on the all-time list lies third behind the now  retired Courtney Walsh and Curtly Ambrose, the two most successful fast  bowlers in Tests matches and ODIs in the history of West Indies  cricket.
Walsh has played 205 ODIs, 41 more than Bravo and has taken 227  wickets, a mere 28 more than Bravo, at an average of 30.47.  The records  show that Ambrose played 176 ODIs, 12 more than Bravo, and took 225  wickets, only 26 more than Bravo, at an average of 24.12. Dares Mr Lloyd  tell us that Bravo’s bowling figures are not on par with or, in some  respects, better than Walsh’s and Ambrose’s?
In addition, Carlos Braithwaite, who was on the team for South  Africa and has been retained for the World Cup, played four matches in  South Africa. In his four innings, he averaged 6.75, scoring a grand  total of 27 runs. Selected mainly for his bowling,  he got exactly no  wickets.  Another fast bowler, Sheldon Cottrell, played two matches and  got two wickets at an average of 53 runs per wicket. We shall spare  him—and us all—the embarrassment of mentioning his batting.
The now prematurely retired Bravo boasts ten fifties and two  centuries in his 164 matches, amassing 2,968 runs at an average of   25.36. I dare Mr Lloyd to tell us that new skipper Jason Holder, former  skipper Darren Sammy, the Smiths, Dwayne and Devon, Leon Johnson,  Jonathan Carter, Andre Fletcher, Kemar Roach, Jerome Taylor, Sulieman  Benn, Walsh, Ambrose, Brathwaite or Cottrell have done or will do better  than that with the bat.
Unreasonably dropped from the Test team in 2010 at the age of 27,  Bravo has played 40 Tests, scoring ,200 runs with three centuries and 13  fifties to his name (ave. 31.42.) He has also got 86 wickets.  Compare  Australia’s Shane Watson who has played 56 games, 16 more than Bravo,  amassing 3646 runs, with four centuries and 74 wickets (ave. 35.74.)  Watson is still representing his country, one of the best teams in the  world currently, while Bravo cannot earn a place on the team which is at  its weakest level in history and is now rated eighth of the ten  Test-playing nations.
Is it the players we need to dispose of or other persons who are  destroying our game? Recall Chris Gayle’s disgust at the performance of  the WICB and its selectors in South Africa? Remember when Tony Cozier  boycotted an entire Test match over the exclusion of the now forgotten  and then eminently forgettable Anderson Cummings from the West Indies  side?
If Tony could boycott, who is we ? Or do we really believe that the  WI can field its best ODI or T-20 team without Bravo and Pollard?